How Far Can We Extend It?
All Situation Room examples are constructed and not descriptions of actual events.
Published on: January 8, 2023
Walter Routh
Share This Article with the Stability Community!
What is the stability situation?
For several years we have been pushing to extend the dating of our single-dose pre-filled syringe parenteral product from 24 to 36 months. Testing through 36 months for three studies at long-term conditions was completed and data sent to the statisticians three months ago, but the conclusions were not as cut and dry as we hoped. Data for three other studies through 24 months has just become available and the project team would like to utilize that data to "help the 36-month data along."
The concern that arose from the statistical analysis is that the 95% confidence interval intersects the upper limit of one degradant at only 37.2 months for an impurity that originates during manufacturing and varies widely at release. In addition, accelerated and intermediate conditions show this impurity increasing dramatically. Because of these two factors, QA was uncomfortable with such a small margin of error. Now, however, when the 24-month data from the three later studies are incorporated in the analysis we get 41.7 months, and everyone is excited to move forward even though the release results for the impurity in question are clearly lower than the initial three studies. They could be skewing the analysis favorably since release and shelf-life specifications are the same.
At an upcoming project meeting the data will be presented to upper management for likely approval to file the dating extension. I’m concerned on two fronts: First, that the risk will be flagged at review, and second, if approved, four years from now an annual lot will fail at expiry because of elevated levels of that impurity at release. Are my concerns founded?
How should this be resolved?
Your concerns are founded when considering that the 24-month data is being used to essentially extrapolate 12 months out even though accelerated and intermediate data are not stable. The analysis is supported by real time data but doesn’t seem to tell the true story. What would our Stabilitarian readers do?
We Want to Hear Your Thoughts!
October 5, 2024
Packaging is being changed late in development while also trying to shortcut around quality checks and balances that Stability is intended for. How does a quality representative explain to upper management the risk they are taking on?
September 7, 2024
What are some ways we could finish cooking this half-baked digitalization process and make our digitized data even more accessible and user friendly?
August 10, 2024
What career path should I take and how can I balance my work and personal life if I choose the difficult stability career path option?
Share your questions and experiences
A stabilitarian encounters new situations every day. StabilityHub’s discussion forums give Stabilitarians an opportunity to ask questions and offer solutions to specific scenarios. Join in the conversations with other Stabilitiarians and share your knowledge!
A stabilitarian encounters new situations every day. StabilityHub’s discussion forums give Stabilitarians an opportunity to ask questions and offer solutions to specific scenarios. Join in the conversations with other Stabilitiarians and share your knowledge!